Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) Review: 8.8/10
“What can you say, these batteries will keep going and going and going.” Best Buy user Cap Tin Turbo didn’t overthink it—and neither did thousands of other buyers who left similar reactions about Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack). Verdict: a dependable household staple with a few recurring gripes around price and packaging. Score: 8.8/10
Quick Verdict
Digging deeper into cross-platform feedback, the headline is consistency: buyers repeatedly frame these AAs as the safe choice for remotes, toys, and flashlights—especially when you don’t want surprises. A Best Buy reviewer, NicholasW, summed up the mundane appeal: “Good as usual! i have used them on various devices.”
At the same time, the most pointed negative comments aren’t about performance—they’re about what people paid or how the order arrived. One Best Buy buyer (Superk 734) didn’t dispute quality, but still complained: “priced too high… on the rack the price said one thing and when i got to register it was more… i wouldn’t buy again.”
Overall: if you want predictable alkaline AA performance and broad compatibility, the consensus leans strongly “yes”—especially for low-to-mid drain electronics.
| Verdict | Evidence from user feedback |
|---|---|
| Buy? | Conditional “Yes” (best when priced well) |
| Biggest pro | Long-lasting in everyday devices (“keep going…”) |
| Biggest con | Price complaints in some reviews (“priced too high”) |
| Best for | Remotes, toys, flashlights, clocks, controllers |
| Not ideal for | People trying to avoid single-use waste |
| Reliability theme | Repeated “dependable,” “consistent,” “no issues” |
| Packaging theme | A minority mention packaging/shipping frustrations |
Claims vs Reality
Energizer’s marketing pitch for Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) revolves around longevity, storage life, and leak protection. On paper, that’s straightforward: Amazon’s listing for Energizer MAX AA notes they “hold their power for up to 10 years while in storage” and are “designed to protect your devices against damaging leaks for up to two years after fully used.” But the more interesting question is how those claims show up in lived stories.
Claim #1: Long-lasting power for everyday devices.
A recurring pattern emerged across retailers: reviewers keep returning to the same phrase—“long lasting”—but tie it to different use cases. For parents, it’s about toys that don’t quit mid-week. Best Buy user Khush Boos wrote: “my son use toys almost everyday and still the battery is going good… long lasting batteries.” For people stocking basic home electronics, the praise is simpler and more repetitive; Best Buy user Humber Tom called them a “dependable and long-lasting power solution” with “outstanding longevity” across devices.
Yet not everyone frames it as miracle endurance; some treat it as expected competence. An Amazon reviewer reduced it to basics: “they are aa batteries. they work well,” signaling satisfaction without the hype.
Claim #2: Shelf life / storage readiness.
While users don’t always cite exact “10 years” numbers, several talk about expiration dates and long storage confidence. Best Buy user OLED 4 Ever praised a “lengthy expiration date,” linking it to the idea of buying bigger packs and forgetting about them until needed. This matters most to emergency-prep households and people who keep spares for flashlights—exactly the scenario Best Buy user Coolv described: “purchased these batteries for my flash lights… long lasting.”
Claim #3: Leak protection.
Leak protection is trickier because most buyers only mention it when something goes wrong—or when they’re relieved it didn’t. Still, multiple reviews explicitly celebrate the absence of leaks. One Best Buy reviewer said: “i like that fact that they don't leak,” framing it as a deciding factor. On eBay, verified purchase reviewer Centek also emphasized peace of mind: “reliable batteries that don't leak over time like competitor brand!” While that’s anecdotal, it aligns with the marketing promise—at least in user perception.
Cross-Platform Consensus
Universally Praised
The strongest consensus around Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) is not about flashy performance—it’s about boring reliability in the devices people actually use daily. On Best Buy, one reviewer distilled the appeal into brand trust: “i mean it’s energizer batteries the name speaks for itself.” That kind of statement shows up when shoppers want a default choice rather than a science experiment.
For families and heavy-use households, longevity becomes a story about fewer interruptions. Best Buy user Zecharia HL claimed: “best batteries ever keeps things working for months.” Best Buy user Khush Boos echoed the same household rhythm—daily toy use without an immediate swap: “my son use toys almost everyday and still the battery is going good.” Meanwhile, an Amazon reviewer who burns through power in a camera emphasized relative improvement: “these did last a lot longer than the other ones i have tried,” a practical win for anyone who uses high-drain devices occasionally but doesn’t want to jump to lithium.
Another widely praised point is broad compatibility: people toss these into remotes, flashlights, controllers, and business supplies without fuss. Best Buy user “reliable and full of power !” wrote: “needed them for my business… will buy them again,” which is less about a single device and more about predictable inventory. Best Buy user ChrisB brought it back to the most common use case: “long lasting still have it in my remote.”
After those narratives, the takeaway stays consistent:
- People praise “long lasting” performance in toys, remotes, and flashlights.
- Many buyers treat brand reliability as the product feature.
- Some explicitly value “don’t leak” peace of mind.
Common Complaints
Complaints exist, but they cluster around the purchase experience rather than the battery chemistry. Price sensitivity shows up repeatedly, especially when buyers feel the cost didn’t match expectations at checkout. Best Buy user Superk 734 didn’t question whether the batteries worked; the frustration was purely transactional: “priced too high… on the rack the price said one thing and when i got to register it was more.” For bargain-driven shoppers, that kind of surprise can outweigh brand trust—particularly because AAs are a commodity people expect to buy cheaply.
Packaging and shipping can also sour impressions, even when the batteries themselves are fine. An Amazon reviewer complained about how items arrived in the box: “my attitude was tainted by the way the aaa batteries were handled… in the same box without any packing.” The underlying story here is about giftability and presentation too—another Amazon reviewer admitted: “unable to give a review… bought this as a gift,” showing how often batteries are purchased as add-ons or practical extras, where fulfillment quality matters more than people admit.
There’s also a quieter complaint theme: some reviews are so generic they imply the product is “fine” but not exciting—useful context for shoppers expecting dramatic gains. For instance, Best Buy user Burrito simply wrote: “just batteries,” and Ty Breezy added: “regular ole batteries… last for a while at least.” That’s not a slam, but it does puncture any expectation of premium transformation.
Divisive Features
The most divisive aspect of Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) is value—whether the longer runtime is worth paying more than store brands or catching them only on sale. Some reviewers insist the brand premium is justified. eBay verified purchase reviewer Dee Pizza Guys framed it as the best option for “video game remotes,” claiming it “lasts a long time like two to three weeks.” Best Buy user “better than others” said, “energizer definitely lasts longer though than other brands,” leaning into performance-per-dollar.
On the other side, price irritation shows up when discounts aren’t available or when pricing feels inconsistent. Superk 734’s “i wouldn’t buy again” is a clear example: for certain shoppers, the battery can be excellent and still not “worth it” if the deal isn’t right.
Trust & Reliability
“Trust” here is less about fraud and more about whether the batteries behave predictably over time. Several reviews lean on long-term purchasing habits as evidence. Best Buy user Huey framed it as repeatable quality: “we can always count on energizer batteries for consistent quality and great shelf life.” That’s the kind of line that shows up after multiple purchases, not a single pack.
Some buyers also compare directly against competitors in a way that signals confidence rather than hype. Best Buy user Big Snoop stated: “last longer than store brand, duracell and amazon batteries.” Another Best Buy reviewer (Lally) offered a more measured comparison: “i would recommend energizer just as good as dure cell.” The message: even where opinions differ on “best,” the product is rarely framed as risky.
As for scam concerns: the provided dataset doesn’t include Trustpilot-style fraud narratives for this specific item. Instead, credibility comes from volume and repetition—Best Buy listings show tens of thousands of reviews and recurring phrasing like “dependable,” “no issues,” and “works great,” such as Best Buy user Satisfied Customer: “the batteries came fast and as described… works great, will buy again.”
Alternatives
Competitors are mostly referenced through user comparisons rather than detailed spec battles. Duracell appears repeatedly as the primary benchmark. Some users see Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) as superior to Duracell; Best Buy user Big Snoop said they last longer than “duracell.” Others see them as effectively equal—Best Buy user Lally wrote: “just as good as dure cell.”
Within the Energizer family itself, one Best Buy reviewer (Sflex) suggested a hierarchy: “only lithium energy ones are a tiny bit stronger.” For shoppers running high-drain gear (flashlights on high output, performance toys, or frequent controller use), that kind of comment implies a practical decision tree: MAX for everyday, lithium for maximum punch—if you’re willing to pay.
Price & Value
Price perception depends heavily on where and when shoppers buy. On Amazon, a 16-count Energizer MAX AA listing shows a price point like “$11.75… $0.73 per count,” while Best Buy listings show higher shelf pricing (e.g., “$19.99” for a 16 pack on one page). That spread helps explain why some users call them a great deal and others call them overpriced.
Resale and marketplace listings reinforce that batteries behave like a commodity: eBay shows multiple new listings clustered around the low-to-mid teens, with “verified purchase” reviewers emphasizing bargains and expiration windows. One eBay reviewer (White-Paint) celebrated a bundle: “2 packs of 16 aa batteries… pretty much price of 1 pack at a store,” tying value directly to bulk pricing.
Buying tips from the crowd follow a consistent logic: stock up when on sale. Best Buy user SD Cult said, “energizer batteries are the best, better when on sale,” capturing the conditional enthusiasm that shows up across platforms.
FAQ
Q: Do Energizer MAX AA batteries actually last longer in real use?
A: Many reviewers say yes, especially in everyday electronics. Best Buy user Cap Tin Turbo wrote: “these batteries will keep going and going and going,” and Amazon reviewers described them as “last a lot longer than the other ones i have tried” in power-hungry devices like cameras.
Q: Are they good for kids’ toys and game controllers?
A: Feedback strongly supports that use case. Best Buy user Khush Boos said: “i bought it for my son’s toys… still the battery is going good,” and another Best Buy reviewer noted they “last a long time in the kids oculus controllers and the xbox controllers.”
Q: Do people complain about leaking?
A: Leak complaints aren’t prominent in the provided reviews; instead, some buyers praise the lack of leaks. One Best Buy reviewer said: “i like that fact that they don't leak,” and an eBay verified buyer described them as “reliable batteries that don't leak over time like competitor brand!”
Q: Is the 16-pack a good value?
A: It depends on the price you find. Some reviewers call them cost-effective over time, but others complain about high or inconsistent pricing. Best Buy user Superk 734 wrote: “priced too high… i wouldn’t buy again,” while SD Cult said they’re “better when on sale.”
Q: Are there better alternatives mentioned by users?
A: Users most often compare them to Duracell and to Energizer lithium. Some say MAX lasts longer than “duracell,” while others say it’s “just as good.” One Best Buy user added that “lithium energy ones are a tiny bit stronger” for extra performance.
Final Verdict
Buy Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) if you’re a household shopper stocking remotes, toys, flashlights, or controllers and you value predictable performance—especially when you can catch a sale. Avoid if you’re highly price-sensitive and frustrated by checkout surprises, like Best Buy user Superk 734: “priced too high… i wouldn’t buy again.” Pro tip from the community: stock up in bulk when discounts hit—SD Cult’s rule of thumb is simple: “better when on sale.”
