Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) Review: 8.7/10
“These batteries will keep going and going and going.” That single line captures the dominant theme across thousands of ratings for Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack)—steady, predictable power that people reach for when they don’t want surprises. Verdict: 8.7/10 based on cross-platform sentiment, with value and longevity praised far more often than anything else.
Quick Verdict
For most households and small businesses, Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) is a Yes—especially for remotes, toys, flashlights, and other everyday gear where reliability matters more than squeezing out the last fraction of cost-per-cell.
| Decision | Evidence from users | Who it’s best for | Where it disappoints |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy | Best Buy reviewers call them “dependable and long-lasting” and “keep going and going” | Families, office admins, people stocking backups | Budget shoppers sensitive to price swings |
| Buy on sale | Multiple reviews praise value when discounted | Anyone buying multipacks | Full-price buyers who expect bargain-bin pricing |
| Skip for eco reasons | Some users flag single-use waste | Heavy battery users who’d rather recharge | People wanting rechargeable options |
| Watch packaging | A few mentions of packing/boxing frustration | Online shoppers | Gift buyers and people expecting premium packing |
Claims vs Reality
Digging deeper into the marketing language, Energizer’s biggest promises revolve around shelf life, leak protection, and better performance in demanding devices. User feedback largely aligns—but with nuance depending on how the batteries are used (low-drain remotes vs. high-drain controllers/cameras).
Energizer positions these as long-lasting, everyday alkaline batteries. That tracks with how people actually use them: remotes, toys, flashlights, wireless mice, and gaming controllers. A Best Buy reviewer summed up the day-to-day reality with: “dependable and long - lasting performance across a variety of devices.” Another kept it simpler: “they keep going.”
Where the “claims” feel less universal is when shoppers zoom in on price and packaging. While the product is framed as a reliable staple, one Amazon reviewer complained about shipping presentation: “nice compact package ( inside a way too large cardboard box ),” and another said their opinion was “tainted by the way the aaa batteries were handled” when bundled shipments were loose in a box. These aren’t performance issues, but they do shape buyer satisfaction.
Claim 1: Long-lasting power for everyday devices
A recurring pattern emerged: people buying these for frequent-use electronics tend to come back because they don’t want performance dips. A Best Buy customer wrote: “energizer batteries are my preferred batteries to use . never have had an issue with performance and they last a long time in the kids oculus controllers and the xbox controllers.” On Amazon, one reviewer using a battery-hungry camera reported: “good batteries and they worked well in my digital camera which uses up batteries like mad . these did last a lot longer than the other ones i have tried.”
Claim 2: Leak protection / “no leaks” positioning
Leak resistance is a major selling point in the specs. Users echo that peace-of-mind angle more than they provide detailed leak incidents. A Best Buy reviewer explicitly called out the fear many people have with stored batteries: “i like that fact that they don't leak . highly recommend 10 / 10 ! !” Another framed it as dependable “durable build quality,” tying reliability to long storage and device safety.
Claim 3: Strong shelf life / storage readiness
Officially, listings emphasize “locks in power for up to 10 years” in storage (and some retailer copy even claims up to 12 years). What users report is less about counting years and more about confidence in backups. A Best Buy reviewer highlighted “great shelf life,” while an eBay buyer celebrated expiry runway: “date good for 8 years 12 - 29.” While the marketing claims are bigger and more specific, the user sentiment supports the general idea: people trust these to sit in a drawer and still work when needed.
Cross-Platform Consensus
The clearest consensus across platforms is that these are the “default safe choice” AA batteries. The sentiment isn’t driven by flashy claims—it’s driven by ordinary people wanting ordinary devices to work, month after month, without fuss.
A recurring pattern emerged in Best Buy reviews: users talk about battery life as if it’s the product’s entire identity. One reviewer called them a “dependable and long - lasting power solution,” emphasizing “outstanding longevity” and “consistent and dependable power output.” Another distilled the experience into a slogan-like line: “energizer it keeps going going …” These aren’t lab measurements; they’re household stories from people who just don’t want to swap batteries constantly.
For parents, the benefit is straightforward: fewer interruptions. A Best Buy reviewer with two young kids described the real-world pressure test: “i have two kids under 10 that blow through batteries . these hold up to their demand.” That framing matters—kids’ toys and controllers don’t fail politely. When batteries fade, it’s immediate frustration, and the praise here is about avoiding that cycle.
For work and business buyers, the “reliable stock” narrative shows up repeatedly. A Best Buy customer wrote: “excellent batteries , doing a great job . needed them for my business . all good and will buy them again.” Another workplace-style endorsement: “these are my go to batteries . i use them at work.” The common thread is reduced downtime—whether it’s office peripherals, tools, or customer-facing devices that can’t be dead.
Universally Praised
Digging deeper into user reports, three themes keep surfacing: longevity, dependable performance across devices, and the convenience of multipacks.
Longevity isn’t described in technical terms—it’s described as relief. A Best Buy reviewer said: “what can you say , these batteries will keep going and going and going.” Another praised the practical impact: “i don’t have to buy these very often . seem to last longer than other brands.” For anyone running a house full of remotes, clocks, and toys, that translates to fewer emergency runs to the store.
Performance consistency matters most in devices that get used daily. A Best Buy user wrote: “never have had an issue with performance,” and another emphasized stable outcomes: “we can always count on energizer batteries for consistent quality.” Even when the comments are plain, the implication is strong: they behave predictably.
Value shows up often, but frequently with a condition: sale pricing. One Best Buy reviewer said: “better when on sale,” and another framed it as paying a bit extra for less hassle: “better to pay a tiny bit more for more battery life.” On eBay, bargain-seeking becomes part of the story, with a buyer celebrating: “2 packs of 16 aa batteries , for pretty much price ... of 1 pack at a store.”
After those narratives, the praise can be summarized as:
- Long battery life in everyday devices (“keep going and going”)
- Reliable performance across toys, remotes, and controllers
- Good value when bought in larger packs or on sale
Common Complaints
Complaints are less about the battery’s core function and more about the buying experience—especially price surprises and packaging/shipping.
Price sensitivity appears when shoppers expect commodity pricing. A Best Buy reviewer was blunt: “priced too high,” adding that the shelf tag didn’t match checkout: “on the rack the price said one thing and when i got to register it was more.” For buyers who only need a quick replacement for a TV remote, that kind of mismatch can outweigh brand loyalty.
Packaging frustrations show up in online orders. One Amazon reviewer liked the compact battery pack but criticized the shipping box: “nice compact package ( inside a way too large cardboard box ).” Another wrote: “my attitude was tainted by the way the aaa batteries were handled” when multiple packs shipped together without protective packing. The batteries may be fine, but the unboxing experience clearly affects perceived quality.
Eco concerns also appear, especially from users who burn through batteries regularly. Even in positive long-form commentary, the drawback is framed clearly: “non - rechargeable : single - use design can be wasteful for frequent users.” Heavy users are the ones most likely to feel this pain.
Summarized complaints:
- Price feels high at times (especially when not discounted)
- Shipping/packaging can be annoying in some orders
- Single-use nature is a downside for frequent battery users
Divisive Features
The most divisive “feature” isn’t performance—it’s whether branded alkalines are worth the premium versus generics or other big names.
Some users see Energizer as the baseline and don’t debate it. A Best Buy review said: “i mean it ’s energizer batteries the name speaks for itself.” Others frame it as outperforming store brands: “last longer than store brand , duracell and amazon batteries.” But at least one reviewer compares them more evenly: “i would recommend energizer just as good as dure cell,” implying that for some buyers it’s a coin flip between top brands.
Trust & Reliability
“Will these leak?” and “Will they still work after sitting around?” are the quiet anxieties behind battery shopping. Across the data here, the trust story skews positive: users repeatedly associate Energizer MAX with consistency and reduced worry.
Best Buy reviewers explicitly lean on reliability language: “we can always count on energizer batteries for consistent quality and great shelf life,” and another called them a “dependable and long - lasting power solution.” On eBay, one buyer contrasted them against unnamed competitors, calling them “reliable batteries that don't leak over time like competitor brand !” While that’s still anecdotal, it shows the trust hook Energizer buyers care about.
Long-term ownership posts aren’t deeply represented as “6 months later” diaries in this dataset, but durability is implied in repeat-buy behavior. A Best Buy reviewer said these became their “go - to choice” and they “won't hesitate to purchase them again,” reflecting a pattern: once the batteries meet expectations, buyers default back to them.
Alternatives
The only explicit competitor mentioned in user text is Duracell (misspelled as “dure cell” in one review). The comparison isn’t about lab performance—it’s about whether you notice a meaningful difference in day-to-day devices.
On the “Energizer wins” side, a Best Buy reviewer claimed: “last longer than store brand , duracell and amazon batteries.” Another said: “energizer definitely lasts longer though than other brands !” On the “similar outcome” side, one reviewer offered: “i would recommend energizer just as good as dure cell.” The takeaway is that buyers who care about brand often see Energizer as equal-or-better, but some see it as simply interchangeable with the other major name.
If you’re choosing between these brands, the data suggests the deciding factor is often price and availability, not dramatic performance gaps—especially for remotes, clocks, and toys.
Price & Value
Pricing swings heavily by retailer and pack configuration, and user feedback reflects that variability. On Amazon, the 16-pack listing shows a concrete price point: “$ 13 . 85” (about “$ 0 . 87 per count”). Best Buy’s 16-pack is shown at “$ 19 . 99” in one listing view, which helps explain why some shoppers say “priced too high” while others call it “a great deal” when promotions hit.
Resale and marketplace listings (eBay) paint a different value picture, with multiple new listings around roughly $10–$16 and some buyers focusing on bundle deals. One eBay reviewer highlighted the appeal of multi-pack economics: “two for the price of one,” while another emphasized shelf-life confidence: “date good for 8 years.”
Buying tips from the crowd are subtle but consistent: buy larger packs, buy on sale, and stock up when you find a good deal. A Best Buy reviewer put it plainly: “better when on sale,” while another justified paying slightly more for fewer replacements: “better to pay a tiny bit more for more battery life.”
FAQ
Q: Do Energizer MAX AA batteries really last longer than other brands?
A: Many reviewers say yes, especially versus store brands. A Best Buy reviewer wrote: “last longer than store brand , duracell and amazon batteries,” and another said they “seem to last longer than other brands.” Performance still depends on device drain (remotes vs controllers).
Q: Are these good for gaming controllers and toys?
A: Yes—this is one of the most common use cases in reviews. A Best Buy customer said they “last a long time in the kids oculus controllers and the xbox controllers,” and another parent wrote: “two kids under 10 that blow through batteries . these hold up to their demand.”
Q: Do they leak or corrode in devices?
A: Users frequently praise leak peace-of-mind, though most comments are general rather than detailed incident reports. One Best Buy reviewer said: “i like that fact that they don't leak,” and an eBay buyer described them as “reliable batteries that don't leak over time like competitor brand !”
Q: Are they worth buying online, or is packaging an issue?
A: Experiences vary. Some users are fine with the product but dislike shipping presentation. An Amazon reviewer noted a “nice compact package ( inside a way too large cardboard box ),” and another said their “attitude was tainted” by how bundled packs were placed in the box without packing.
Final Verdict
Buy if you’re stocking Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) for a busy household, office drawer, kids’ toys, flashlights, or controllers—especially if you value “consistent quality” and fewer battery swaps. Avoid if you’re extremely price-sensitive and shopping off-sale, or if you want rechargeable options to cut waste. Pro tip from the community: watch for deals—one Best Buy reviewer said they’re “better when on sale,” and eBay buyers rave about “two for the price of one” multipack bargains.
