Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) Review: 8.6/10
“They keep going and going and going.” That single line captures why Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) keeps showing up in households, offices, and emergency kits—and why some shoppers still balk at the price. Verdict: 8.6/10 based strictly on the provided cross-platform feedback.
Quick Verdict
Conditional Yes — a strong pick for everyday devices and low-to-mid drain use, especially if you care about “no-leak” peace of mind and shelf life. The main hesitation is value: some buyers feel pricing swings can make them hard to justify.
| What buyers agree on | Evidence from feedback | Who it matters to | Potential downside |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-lasting in common devices | Best Buy reviews repeatedly praise “long-lasting” and “keep going” | Families with toys/remotes | Not always best in high-drain vs lithium |
| Trusted, consistent performance | Best Buy: “always reliable and long lasting” | Anyone who hates battery roulette | Brand premium pricing |
| Leak resistance is a selling point | Best Buy: “i like that fact that they don't leak” | People protecting pricey devices | Not many detailed “leak tests,” mostly trust |
| Good for remotes/toys/flashlights | Best Buy + Amazon use cases | Households, preparedness | Heavy users may find it costly |
| Value depends on deal | Best Buy + Trustpilot review notes price issues | Bulk buyers | One buyer calls it “priced too high” |
Claims vs Reality
Marketing for Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) leans hard on longevity and readiness. On Amazon’s specs page, Energizer promises batteries that “hold their power for up to 10 years while in storage” and are “designed to protect your devices against damaging leaks for up to two years after fully used.” Digging deeper into user reports, the lived experience generally supports the “dependable household battery” narrative, but it’s less precise than the claims—people talk in weeks, months, and “I don’t buy often,” not lab-style percentages.
Claim 1: “Long-lasting power.” Across Best Buy’s huge review volume, a recurring pattern emerged: people don’t describe marginal gains—they describe relief. A Best Buy reviewer said: “energizer are the go to batteries . always reliable and long lasting.” Another put it even more bluntly: “what can you say , these batteries will keep going and going and going .” For parents and gamers, that “keep going” sentiment becomes a lifestyle perk: one Best Buy customer said the batteries “last a long time in the kids oculus controllers and the xbox controllers .”
Claim 2: “Leak-resistant protection.” Official copy highlights leak resistance for up to two years after full use. User feedback doesn’t provide many detailed incident reports, but it does show that leak protection is a real buying trigger. A Best Buy customer emphasized: “i like that fact that they don't leak . highly recommend 10 / 10 ! !” Meanwhile, a longform community-style review on TheGunZone echoed the same theme from a real-world perspective: “i ’ ve never experienced any leaking or corrosion issues with these batteries,” framing it as device-protection peace of mind.
Claim 3: “Up to 50% longer lasting” (in demanding devices) appears in Amazon specs for Energizer MAX AA. Here the gap is subtle: shoppers praise longevity, but the one objective-style benchmark in the dataset comes from CHOICE lab testing, where Energizer Max scored notably stronger in low-drain than high-drain conditions (e.g., “performance ( low drain ) score 83 %” vs “performance ( high drain ) score 52 %”). While marketing suggests big gains in demanding devices, the test data and user stories point to the biggest satisfaction coming from remotes, clocks, flashlights, toys—classic low-to-mid drain scenarios.
Cross-Platform Consensus
Universally Praised
“They are batteries … they work well” is the understated Amazon review version of a broader theme: people buy Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) to remove uncertainty. A recurring pattern emerged across Best Buy, Amazon reviews, and TheGunZone’s community write-up: users don’t just want power—they want predictable power. A Best Buy reviewer summarized the brand trust factor: “i mean it ’s energizer batteries the name speaks for itself.” For busy households, that predictability means fewer surprise failures in the middle of a movie night or a toy meltdown.
Longevity is the headline praise, but it shows up in personal routines rather than technical numbers. For heavy-use families, the benefit is fewer replacement cycles and fewer last-minute store runs. On Best Buy’s “Trustpilot” listing (customer reviews), user moab 461 wrote: “i have two kids under 10 that blow through batteries . these hold up to their demand . energizer all the way.” That’s not a controlled test—but it’s a clear “keeps up with chaos” story, which is exactly the kind of use-case that drives repeat buying.
In lower-drain devices, people consistently describe months-long steadiness. TheGunZone reviewer laid out a household spread—remotes, clocks, mice, toys, flashlights—and reported: “in remote controls and clocks , i ’ ve found them to last several months.” That aligns neatly with CHOICE’s lab tilt toward low-drain strength (“endurance ( low drain ) score 91 %”), even though the platforms speak different languages (stories vs rigs).
Finally, “ready when you need them” matters to preparedness-minded shoppers. Several buyers talk about keeping packs around rather than buying one-offs. A Best Buy reviewer said they were “glad to find a large pack of batteries,” noting “you are always in need of batteries for electronics.” For anyone stocking up for flashlights or remotes, that bulk convenience is part of the product’s appeal, not just the chemistry.
Common Complaints
The most consistent dissatisfaction isn’t about performance—it’s about price and purchase experience. Digging deeper into user reports, complaints cluster around “what I paid” and “how it arrived,” not “it died too fast.” On Best Buy’s “Trustpilot” listing, user superk 734 gave a 3-star review focused on sticker shock: “priced too high . ... on the rack the price said one thing and when i got to register it was more ... i wouldn’t buy again.” For deal-sensitive shoppers, that kind of pricing frustration can outweigh brand loyalty, especially when batteries feel interchangeable.
Packaging and shipping also show up as friction points, particularly when bundles mix sizes. An Amazon reviewer explained their disappointment wasn’t the batteries themselves: “my attitude was tainted by the way the aaa batteries ... were handled . they were in the same box without any packing.” That complaint isn’t about Energizer’s performance, but it does affect perceived value—if a shopper is paying a premium, they expect premium handling.
There’s also a quieter, more philosophical complaint: single-use alkalines can feel wasteful for frequent users. TheGunZone review explicitly flags “non - rechargeable” as a downside and calls out “environmental impact” and long-run cost. Even when people like the batteries, high-consumption households may feel pushed toward rechargeables or waiting for deep discounts.
Divisive Features
The biggest split is whether the brand premium is “worth it.” Some reviewers treat the extra cost as obvious insurance. A Best Buy reviewer insisted: “better to pay a tiny bit more for more battery life,” and another framed it as a clear hierarchy: “energizer definitely lasts longer though than other brands !” For shoppers burned by cheap batteries dying early—or worried about leaks—paying more reads like avoiding hassle.
On the other hand, value-minded buyers can interpret the same product as overpriced, especially when they encounter price inconsistencies. superk 734’s “priced too high” review shows how quickly a practical purchase becomes a regret if the checkout price feels unfair. In short: brand trust is a strong asset, but it doesn’t fully protect Energizer from “it’s just batteries” skepticism.
Trust & Reliability
Trust in Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) is unusually high across platforms, but it’s driven by habit and long-running brand reputation more than detailed failure reports. Best Buy reviewers repeatedly emphasize consistency: user huey said, “we can always count on energizer batteries for consistent quality and great shelf life.” That “count on” phrasing is telling—buyers are treating the product like a household utility.
When it comes to “scam concerns,” the provided “Trustpilot (Verified)” dataset is actually a Best Buy customer review feed for the 16-pack. The visible pattern there doesn’t suggest fraud; it suggests typical retail gripes (pricing, ordinary expectations). The sharpest negativity is transactional (price mismatch), not authenticity claims.
Long-term durability stories appear most clearly in the community-style TheGunZone review, which reads like a “lived with it” account: “over the years , i have repeatedly purchased these energizer aa max batteries,” and “i ’ ve never experienced any leaking or corrosion issues.” While it’s a single source, it matches the wider crowd sentiment that these are “dependable” batteries meant to fade into the background—until you need a flashlight during a power outage.
Alternatives
Only competitors explicitly mentioned in the provided data can be compared here, and users do mention them. On Best Buy’s “Trustpilot” list, user lally wrote: “i would recommend energizer just as good as dure cell,” positioning Duracell as the obvious cross-shop. Another reviewer, big snoop, went further: “last longer than store brand , duracell and amazon batteries.” That’s a strong claim, but it’s still anecdotal—what stands out is that comparisons happen in everyday terms (“last longer”), not technical specs.
CHOICE also gives an implicit alternative route: it notes that “lithium batteries may give you better performance overall,” but discusses value tradeoffs. For shoppers running high-drain devices (camera flashes, high-performance toys), that lab framing suggests the real decision is device-based: alkaline MAX for routine household loads, lithium when performance under heavy drain is the priority.
Price & Value
Pricing sentiment depends heavily on where people buy and whether they caught a deal. Best Buy’s massive review base includes many “great price” sentiments—one reviewer called them “awesome batteries at great price,” and another said, “the price at best buy is great.” On Amazon, the 16-pack listing shows a concrete anchor (“$ 11 . 75” for a 16-count at the time of capture), which sets expectations that can make higher retail pricing feel painful.
Resale/market listings on eBay reinforce that batteries are treated like commodities with deal-hunting behavior: listings for the 16-pack hover around the low teens (e.g., “$ 10 . 99,” “$ 11 . 90,” “$ 13 . 44”), often with shipping considerations. eBay reviews also echo the core value proposition: verified purchaser dee pizza guys said it “lasts a long time like two to three weeks” in video game remotes, and centek praised “reliable batteries that don't leak over time like competitor brand !”
Practical buying tips emerge indirectly: bulk packs reduce per-battery cost, and shoppers with constant battery churn notice savings when longevity reduces replacement frequency. As one Best Buy reviewer put it: “great quality batteries that are long lasting . my choice over all other brand batteries .” The flip side is clear too—if the pack is priced high or the checkout experience feels off, value collapses fast.
FAQ
Q: Are Energizer MAX AA batteries good for remotes and clocks?
A: Yes—feedback most strongly supports low-to-mid drain devices like remotes and clocks. TheGunZone review notes they lasted “several months” in “remote controls and clocks,” and Best Buy reviewers repeatedly call them “reliable and long lasting” for everyday electronics.
Q: Do they really last longer than other brands?
A: Many buyers say yes, but it’s mostly anecdotal. Best Buy reviewers claim “energizer definitely lasts longer though than other brands,” and Best Buy user big snoop wrote they last longer than “store brand , duracell and amazon batteries.” CHOICE lab data suggests stronger performance in low-drain than high-drain use.
Q: Do these batteries leak?
A: Users frequently praise leak resistance, though detailed failure stories aren’t common in the provided feedback. A Best Buy reviewer said, “i like that fact that they don't leak,” and TheGunZone reviewer reported, “i ’ ve never experienced any leaking or corrosion issues.” Official specs also emphasize leak protection after full use.
Q: Are they worth the price?
A: It depends on the deal and how often you replace batteries. Many Best Buy reviewers call them a “great price” and “good value,” but Best Buy user superk 734 complained they were “priced too high” after a register surprise. Heavy users may justify the cost through fewer replacements.
Q: Are they good for high-drain devices like cameras or gaming controllers?
A: They’re commonly used there, but results may vary by device. An Amazon reviewer said they worked well in a “digital camera” that “uses up batteries like mad,” and TheGunZone reviewer found performance “satisfactory” in gaming controllers. CHOICE testing shows lower scores in high-drain than low-drain conditions.
Final Verdict
Buy Energizer MAX AA Batteries (16 Pack) if you’re powering a steady stream of remotes, toys, flashlights, controllers, or a wireless mouse and you value predictable runtime and anti-leak confidence. Avoid if you’re extremely price-sensitive or you’re buying at a retailer where pricing feels inconsistent. Pro tip from the community: watch for multipack deals—one eBay reviewer loved “two for the price of one,” calling it “hard not to like this deal.”
